Tuesday, June 14, 2022
HomeEuropean NewsWas the EU's response to Shireen Abu Aklek's funeral sufficient?

Was the EU’s response to Shireen Abu Aklek’s funeral sufficient?



The assassination of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh was broadly condemned, particularly by the European Union.

The picture of the EU Consultant in Palestine attempting to mediate for Israeli Occupation Forces to permit the funeral to happen entered virtually each Palestinian residence.

As did the brutal assaults in opposition to these carrying the coffin on the French Hospital; in opposition to the automobile transporting it; in opposition to the mourners that had been leaving the Catholic church of Jaffa Gate of Jerusalem’s Outdated Metropolis; in opposition to the gathering the place the household was receiving condolences and the 1000’s that had been prevented from becoming a member of the procession on account of Israel’s motion restrictions.

Regardless of the efforts of European diplomats on the bottom and the sturdy statements popping out from Brussels and different European capitals, Israel did precisely what it needed.

The aggressions had been primarily motivated by the truth that the mourners had raised Palestinian flags to bid farewell to a Palestinian hero brutally murdered.

Palestinian flag ban

This week the Israeli parliament went one step forward, voting on a decision to ban the Palestinian flag. Solely 16 votes had been solid in opposition to, primarily from Palestinian residents of Israel.

The European Union might do far more than leaving its consultant to Palestine alone in attempting to remind Israel, the occupying energy, of its obligations beneath worldwide legislation.

This begins by messaging — a easy evaluation of the EU delegations to Israel and Palestine reveals that each have radically completely different approaches: whereas these in Palestine deal with human rights and respect for worldwide legislation, these in Israel appear to think about Israel’s colonial-settlement occupation of Palestine, and its apartheid regime, a secondary challenge to financial issues.

In different phrases, the EU delegation in Tel Aviv sends a message to Israelis that grave and systematic human rights violations aren’t a precedence and that no person will probably be held accountable.

That is much like what the speaker of the European parliament Roberta Metsola informed the Israeli parliament final month.

We had been astonished to see her keep away from referring to the Israeli occupation and day by day crimes and violations.

She even ignored that over 20-percent of Israel’s inhabitants are Palestinian residents and centred her deal with to Israeli Jews, who had been happy to see somebody, regardless of of the Amnesty Worldwide and Human Rights Watch studies on Israel’s apartheid insurance policies, determined to assert that Europe and Israel share “widespread values”.

In fact, justice for Shireen Abu Akleh was not a part of the assertion from somebody who must be actually involved about Israel’s systematic violation of primary rules of their agreements with the EU, together with Article 2 of the Affiliation Settlement that situations its implementation to respecting human rights.

What we see is that the emphasis on accountability from Brussels takes place solely in opposition to the Palestinian individuals.

The anti-Palestinian obsession of commissioner Oliver Varhelyi has succeeded in stopping Palestinian hospitals from receiving European funds. This isn’t very completely different to what the Trump Administration did.

Palestinian textbooks challenge

The worst a part of it’s that his assaults in opposition to the Palestinian authorities, notably with regards to Palestinian textbooks, are largely based mostly on right-wing Israeli assume tanks and even settlers moderately than what neutral studies have proven.

In 2022 the voice of Israeli settlers appears to be extra thought of by some in Brussels than what Amnesty Worldwide says about Israeli apartheid insurance policies. Regretfully, this doesn’t cease there.

A number of the favorite ministers within the present authorities by their European counterparts, together with Yair Lapid and Omer Barlev, have contributed to the misinformation marketing campaign across the killing of Shireen Abu Akleh and supported the fascist march that happened in Occupied East Jerusalem.

In Barlev’s case, a Labor Celebration member, he himself accredited an indication final Sunday that concerned turning elements of Occupied East Jerusalem right into a violent riot with 1000’s of radical Zionists shouting “Demise to the Arabs”.

Solely at some point after this happened, the German minister of inside Nancy Faeser was seen smiling assembly Barlev, committing to extra cooperation.

Did she ask about his position within the assaults in opposition to Shireen Abu Aklek’s funeral? About how Christians had been prevented from reaching the Holy Sepulchre at Easter? In regards to the assaults in opposition to Al-Aqsa mosque throughout Ramadan? I feel everyone knows the reply.

It’s tough to clarify to our individuals how the EU made speedy use of all diplomatic instruments at its avail within the case of Ukraine after 5 days of battle however has averted to do the identical in Palestine throughout the previous 74 years.

Europe can’t proceed to keep away from to imagine its obligations in Palestine.

This avoidance undermines the entire idea of a multilateral rules-based world order. With the case of Shireen Abu Akleh the EU had a possibility to revert this path.

Regretfully, it has exhibited a scarcity of political will to take any type of motion — and Israel is aware of that nicely.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments