Navarro was nonetheless within the White Home when Trump tried to overturn the election outcomes, however Bannon was fired from Trump’s White Home in August 2017, though he remained in touch with Trump in subsequent years.
In contrast to Bannon and Navarro, Meadows and Scavino engaged in months-long negotiations with the choose committee, haggling over the phrases of potential testimony and the bounds of govt privilege. Meadows additionally turned over 1000’s of textual content messages and communications he had with members of Congress and different White Home advisers.
The choose committee opted to pursue contempt prices in opposition to Meadows and Scavino, nonetheless, after the negotiations didn’t end in plans for both of them to testify. Meadows had been scheduled for a December deposition however withdrew on the final second.
Committee chair Rep Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) and Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) referred to as choice “puzzling” in an announcement.
“Mr. Meadows and Mr. Scavino unquestionably have related data about President Trump’s function within the efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the occasions of January sixth. We hope the Division supplies higher readability on this matter,” the assertion mentioned.
Meadows’ lawyer George Terwillger III didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark. Scavino’s lawyer Stan Model didn’t instantly touch upon the information. The U.S. Lawyer’s workplace for Washington D.C. declined to remark.
Although Home Democrats welcomed the choice to cost Bannon and Navarro, each have been considerably ancillary figures in Trump’s orbit throughout the former president’s try and overturn the 2020 election. Meadows and Scavino, nonetheless, performed central roles and have been at Trump’s facet as a mob attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 in help of his effort to forestall the switch of energy.
The New York Occasions first reported the Justice’s Division’s choice to not cost Meadows and Scavino with contempt of Congress.